Showing posts with label Roland Garros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roland Garros. Show all posts

Monday, 26 May 2014

'Let It Go' - The Tennis Version

"Where there's tennis, there's a rain delay"
     - old Chinese proverb
The 2014 edition of the Roland Garros barely started, and we're deep into a rain delay already. And what's a better way to spend a rain delay than to listen to a tennis player singing Let It Go at the top of his lungs?

I'll tell you what - writing a new set of lyrics for Let It Go, tennis themed of course! Thanks so much to @triplebagel for the idea and the corrections.

When you read the song, think... Maria Sharapova.

The clay shines red on the court tonight
Not a ballmark to be seen
A kingdom of tennis matches
Which player is the Queen?
The wind is howling and the forehand lands outside
Couldn't keep it in;
Heaven knows I've tried

Don't let them win,
don't let them see
Be the best, just like you have to be
Conceal, with feel
The slice goes low
Well now they know

Let it go, let it go
Don't hit it short anymore
Let it go, let it go
Ace away, smash like before

I don't care
What they're going to say
Let the crowd rage on
The noise never bothered me anyway

It's funny how some backhands
Make this court seem small
And opponents that once controlled me
Can't get to me at all

It's time to see what I can do
To test my limits and break through
No LET, no OUT, no rules for me
I'm free!

Let it go, let it go,
I am one with the court and sky
Let it go, let it go,
You'll never see me cry

Here I stand 
And here I'll serve
Let the crowd rage on...

My power hitting through the air into the ground
Sends the ball spiraling to lines and corners all around
And every forehand is unanswered, like a blast
I'm never losing now, the past is in the past

Let it go, let it go
And I'll rise at the break of dawn
Let it go, let it go
Those errors are all gone

Here I stand
In the light of day
Let the crowd rage on
The noise never bothered me anyway!

Friday, 31 May 2013

ATP Uncovered - Roland Garros Ice Bath Edition + Poll

Social media often allows us a unique glimpse into the life of tennis players. Whether it's Sara Errani and Serena Williams discussing Candy Crush Saga, or Andy Murray being bored while not competing - we'd never find out about it without twitter.

The ATP players, meanwhile, seem to be on some kind of dare which involves them posting semi-naked pictures and videos of them in the Roland Garros locker-room ice bath. Warning: NESFW! (Not Entirely Safe For Work)

The trend started with Blaz Kavcic, after his 6-2 6-2 6-2 win over James Duckworth in the first round of the French Open.



It continued with - how not - Fabio Fognini, after his 6-2 7-6(3) 2-6 6-1 win over Lukas Rosol (denying a possible Nadal-Rosol rematch). The pic was posted by Marc Boada, Fognini's physio.



The best bromance on the ATP tour wasn't far behind - Benoit Paire and Stanislas Wawrinka posted ice bath pics of one another (though much more covered, to the chagrin of many).




And finally, the cherry on top - a video! For his Eurosport segment "Tipsy Time", Janko Tipsarevic filmed Viktor Troicki getting into the ice bath, with a guest appearance by Novak Djokovic.


The only question left to ask... who's next?

June 3 UPDATE: Well, apparently the next one is Nicolas Mahut! He gives us two photos for our consideration.





And now, for the poll - whose ice bath did you like the best?


Tuesday, 28 May 2013

Grand Slam Matches Formats



"Are they playing best of five in doubles here?"
"Wait, and is it a tiebreak in the final set?"
"But wasn't it different in qualifying?"

Those questions come up in every Grand Slam, and no wonder - the individual Slams are free to choose their own play format for every one of the events they're running (Men/Women, Singles/Doubles/Mixed, Main Draw/Qualifying). The only fixed rule is that Men's Singles must be best of five (5) sets. All other events can be best of five or best of three, can end in a tiebreak or an advantage set. Confusing? Maybe, but not for long. Here are all the common rules and formats, with a short glossary for all the tennis terms you're not sure about.

ATP/WTA tennis tournaments
Singles - best of 3 sets, all 3 are tiebreak sets, ad scoring.
Doubles - best of 3 sets - 2 tiebreak sets & 3rd supertiebreak, no-ad scoring.

ITF Grand Slams
(All matches are ad scoring unless noted otherwise)

Australian Open/ Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open
Men's Singles Best of 5
4 tiebreak sets, 5th advantage set
Best of 5
4 tiebreak sets, 5th advantage set
Best of 5
5 tiebreak sets
Women's Singles Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Men's Doubles Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Best of 5
4 tiebreak sets, 5th advantage set
Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Women's Doubles Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Mixed Doubles Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd supertiebreak
No-ad scoring
Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd supertiebreak
No-ad scoring
Men's Singles Qualifying Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
First rounds-Best of 3
Final round-Best of 5
2/4 tiebreak sets, 3rd/5th advantage set
Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Women's Singles Qualifying Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
Best of 3
3 tiebreak sets
Men's Doubles Qualifying -- Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
--
Women's Doubles Qualifying -- Best of 3
2 tiebreak sets, 3rd advantage set
--

Tennis Glossary

  • Tiebreak set - The set is played until a player reaches 6 or 7 games, with a 2-game margin. A tiebreak is played when the score is 6-6. To win a tiebreak, a player needs to win at least 7 points, with a 2-point margin (7-5, 8-6, etc).
  • Advantage set - no tiebreaks are played, and the set continues until one of the players has a 2-game margin (8-6, 9-7, etc). Today, only the last and deciding set of the match (the 5th or the 3rd) can be played as an advantage set, while all the other sets are tiebreak sets.
  • Supertiebreak - A set that consists of a tiebreak, in which a player has to win at least 10 points with a 2-point advantage.
  • No-ad scoring - A scoring method in which the 40-40 point is a deciding point - whoever wins it, wins the game. This scoring is employed in ATP/WTA doubles matches, and in Grand Slam Mixed Doubles (except in Wimbledon). 
  • Ad scoring - after getting to 40-40, the player/team must win two points to win the game (the first of those is the "advantage" point). This is the usual method of scoring in tennis tournaments.

Friday, 24 May 2013

The Roland Garros Drinking Game

The players are in Paris, the men's and women's draws have come out, and tennis' long time foe - the weather - is already wreaking havoc during the qualifying matches and players' practices. Yes, the French Open is upon us at last!

For fans, every Grand Slam invokes a certain routine. At first, it's the draw ceremony. You spend days counting the minutes, you moan about the coverage of the draw being absolutely useless, and then you spend hours lamenting your favourites' difficult paths to the elusive titles. At this point (this is now, in case you're wondering), you realize that the tournament is going to start before the weekend's even over, and you must stock up on all the necessary equipment - food (you won't have time to leave the house for two weeks now), tissues (for that moment when you start breaking down in the middle of a sleepless night), and a fair amount of alcohol. While urging everyone to vamos (or ajde or allez or davai, or all of them if you're a Putintseva fan) responsibly, here's a drinking game to pass you through the two weeks of the 2013 edition of the Roland Garros.


Ready? Let's go!

Take a swig every time a commentator proclaims Rafael Nadal or Serena Williams the heavy title favourites.
Down a shot if there's a discussion of the alleged unfairness of Rafael Nadal's #4 seed or its effect on the Djokovic-Nadal predicted semifinal.
Take a sip if anybody calls Maria Sharapova 'Cow on ice'.
Drink if Benoit Paire, Jerzy Janowicz or Ernests Gulbis hits an unnecessarily ridiculous dropshot. Finish your drink if it wins them the point. Pour yourself another drink if they lose the point and go on a youtube-worthy meltdown.
Take a shot on every single rain delay.
Finish your drink when grunting comes up. 
Take a swig when Petra Kvitova botches an easy shot. Take two swigs when Tomas Berdych does the same. Hospitalize yourself if they're both playing at the same time. 
Take a shot if the scheduling for the next day makes no sense. Make that two shots if it's quarterfinals day and the matches are all at the same time.
Sip every time the French crowd starts booing a player. Finish your drink when they begin whistling.
Take a swig each time you have to use the Roland Garros mobile app (Android or iPhone, but you really don't want to install it).
Drink deep into the night when matches are cancelled or called off due to darkness (get some floodlights, Paris!)
Finish your bottle if Rafa and Serena actually win both titles. Drink enough to completely pass out if you're FFT president Jean Gachassin, since a French player didn't win.


Enjoy the action, everybody guys! (And feel free adding your own drinking scenarios in the comments)

Monday, 29 April 2013

Roland Garros 2013 Seeding Scenarios

One of the major debates raging in the tennis world these days is whether the Roland Garros seeding committee should depart from the regular ATP rankings and seed Rafael Nadal higher than his current (and possibly future) #5 ranking. What happens if they don't? With two big tournaments left to play - Madrid and Rome - the rankings might still change in several ways. David Ferrer and Rafael Nadal will contest the #4 spot, while Andy Murray and Roger Federer will fight over the #2 ranking. If ranking calculations are not your forte, here are the major possible scenarios.

The Basic Numbers

All four players will be seeded in both Rome and Madrid, and will get first round BYEs. Therefore, the points they can earn (in each of the tournaments) are:
R2 loss - 10
R3 loss - 90
QF loss - 180
SF loss - 360
F loss - 600
W - 1000

David Ferrer & Rafael Nadal

First of all, it's important to note that Ferrer's Estoril results won't be relevant to these caculations - he already has an ATP250 tournament win (worth 250 points) that he can't count, so even if he wins Estoril his current points total won't change.

Stripping away the points Ferrer and Nadal are defending in the two clay Masters 1000 tournaments, Ferrer has 6380 points, and Nadal - 4895 points. That's a difference of 1485 points between the two, which Nadal will have to overcome in order to get to #4. Thus, we can start analyzing.

If Ferrer gets at least 515 points in both tournaments combined, he'll stay #4 until the French Open, regardless of Nadal's result. Thus, Ferrer will be #4 if:

  • He reaches the final of either of the tournaments
  • He makes at least a QF in one tournament and at least a SF in the other
Furthermore, Nadal has to get extremely good results to even have a chance of getting the #4 ranking. If he wins less than 1485 points in both tournaments combined, he'll stay #5. Thus, Nadal has to win one of Madrid/Rome and make the final of the other, and even that might not be enough if Ferrer's results are good enough. If Nadal fails to win Madrid, Ferrer only has to win two matches during the two events to stay #4. 

Andy Murray & Roger Federer

Without the points of Madrid and Rome, Andy Murray has 8480 points (he didn't play in Madrid last year, and lost early in Rome), while Federer has 7310 (he won Madrid and reached the Rome SF in 2012). That's a difference of 1170 points in Murray's favor. 

If Murray gets at least 830 points in both tournaments combined, he'll guarantee himself the #2 seed for the Roland Garros. Murray will be #2 anyway if:
  • He wins either Madrid or Rome
  • He reaches the final of one tournament and the SF of the other
Federer, like Nadal, has to make it far if he wants to get to #2. If he wins 1180 points or less, he'll remain #3. Therefore, Federer has to do one of the following to have a chance at #2:
  • Make the finals at both tournaments
  • Win one tournament and reach at least SF at the other 
The more matches Murray wins in Madrid, the farther Federer will have to go - if Murray wins three matches (Madrid SF), Federer needs W+F, if Murray reaches the Madrid final, Federer has to win both tournaments to stand a chance.

Of course, all of those scenarios can't all happen together - out of the four players, at most one can win each of the two tournaments. The draw in Madrid might even make some of these options unreachable. But until then, you can at least know what you want your favourite player to do.

Edited on May 9: Federer's loss means that he won't be seeded #2 in France; but at most #3 (can even fall down to #4 if Ferrer does really well in Rome and Federer does not).

*********

Personally, I think the Roland Garros seeding committee should follow the rankings as they are. The concept of protected ranking exists in the ATP for cases just like this one, when a player has been away with an injury for a long period of time. The rule, not accidentally, states that protected ranking will be used only for determining entry lists, not for seeding. There's no good reason to deviate from that rule now, and changing the seeding to fit a specific player (or a specific group of players, in this case) is a dangerous and unfair precedent.

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

This Is Why We Watch Tennis

After more than 3 hours, in a match filled with unbelievable drama, Virginie Razzano defeated Serena Williams, 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

This match came after a day of mostly predictable and not entirely interesting results. Unusually for the beginning of a Grand Slam, there weren't too many moments of "Oh my, there are so many matches I'd like to see at once!". The conversation among tennis fans and journalists alike revolved mainly around the highly important question "What is the colour of Rafa's new shirt?".

Nike might call it Scarlet Fire, for me it's pink
When Razzano lost a 4-2 lead and double faulted to give Serena the first set, it looked like just another result to add to the list of seeds moving comfortably on to the second round. She kept it tight in the second set, taking it to a tiebreak despite starting to cramp, but when Williams raced to a 5-1 lead there, the match was practically over.

But that's the beauty of tennis, isn't it? No matter how over the match might seem, it's never over until the "Game, Set, Match". Up 5-2 and with two points away from the win, Serena stopped play on a good ball she thought was out. A point later, her (probable winner) shot was called out, but overruled by chair umpire Eva Asderaki (she of the famous hindrance incident), leading to a replay of the point. One thing led to another, and Williams lost her focus and the second set.

With the match passing the 2 hours mark, Virginie still cramping, and Williams having a perfect 46-0 record in Slam opening rounds, hardly anybody thought the Frenchwoman had any chances in the final set. She opened it with a love hold, prompting the Eurosport commentator to say "A real test of character for a legend of the game". Little did he know.

One game after the other, Razzano didn't seem to stop. At 4-0 up, she yelped with pain during one of the rallies. True to form, Asderaki called a hindrance, and determined the point should be replayed. Visibly limited, Virginie had trouble serving in the following point. Certain this was the peak of the drama, the aforementioned commentator stated "We've just about seen it all now". Little did he know.

Bolstered by the crowd supporting the local favourite, Razzano held on for 5-0. Williams, in the meantime, could hardly find the court, and won only five points in those five games. She hit an ace to go up 30-15, but was next wrong-footed by Razzano, who at this point was just two points away from the whole match. However, this wouldn't do for Serena, who finished the game with a great volley. "The comeback - begins!" said the commentator. Little did he know.

What unraveled from this point onwards left everyone gaping in disbelief. Serving for the match (5-1), with the score being 30-30, hindrance was called again after Razzano's cry of pain. This time she lost the point, and eventually - the game (not before saving a couple of break points). The exact same thing happened when Razzano was serving for it for the second time. Once again, at 30-30, Asderaki called hindrance, to give a first break point to Serena. That comeback looked practically over. Little did we all know.

Saving five break points with courageous serving, and reaching eight match points of her own altogether, Virginie Razzano finally closed out the match, after more than 3 hours of play. The match was filled with drama from start to finish, and even the last match point was momentarily disputed, before the umpire declared Serena's ball to be out. Every point had you screaming in disbelief, not knowing how to react or where to turn for support. Every shot looked like it could evolve into two completely different story-lines. Every serve had you wondering what would happen next, and will you ever see the end of it all. And THIS - this is why we watch tennis.

 (Photos: Getty Images)

Monday, 28 May 2012

Tipsy Time returns!

Janko Tipsarevic's video blog during the Australian Open was a big success, with funny videos showing life on tour from behind the scenes. The world No. 8 player is reunited with a personal video camera during the Roland Garros, and there's no doubt that it will be fun to watch.

Watch this space for links to all the new videos as they come out on Eurosport!

Video #0 - Fasten Your Seat Belts (Preview)

Video #1 - I have the worst hair on Tour



Video #2 - New haircut for Janko



Video #3 (interview) - Lucky Tipsy having "fun"



Video #4 - Pedicure



Video #5 - Thief steals Janko's shoes



Video #6 - A day in Janko's life



Video #7 (day 8) - Nestor is scum!



Video #8 (day 10) -Janko back on decks at home


Saturday, 26 May 2012

Luck or Conspiracy: Federer and Djokovic in Grand Slam Draws

A new Grand Slam is upon us, and the French Open draw was held yesterday. Despite the promised live showing of the draw, we were left to guess what was going on, while the tournament's official twitter account suggested helpful things like changing our Facebook language to French. Technical problems aside, however, we have the new men's and women's draws, and with them come the surprises.

Or do they? Once again this year, Victoria Azarenka and Agnieszka Radwanska are drawn into the same half. Once again in a Grand Slam tournament, Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer end up in the same half. The latter result had people crying 'Conspiracy' and 'Draw fixing!' long ago, claiming that the odds for that happening are near impossible.

I looked at the last 20 Slams, starting with Wimbledon 2007, which is when Djokovic started getting a top-4 seed. Since then, Federer and Djokovic were on the same side of the draw 15 times. If you assume that they have a 50% chance of falling in the same half, the possibility of that event occurring 15 times out of 20 is about 1.5%. A lot of the calculations I've seen before on the topic give even lower numbers than this one. However, in my opinion, this is the wrong way of looking at the numbers.

The main thing to remember is that the Slams don't draw specific players to face each other. Rather, the players are drawn out by their seeding in the tournament. And this is where the conspiracy theories start to fail.

The 1st and 2nd seeds are always placed on different sides of the draw. Following that, one of the next two seeds - #3 or #4 - is drawn into the #1's half. So, in every draw, we can get either #1-#3 (and #2-#4) or the other way around - #1-#4 and #2-#3. Those are the events that really have a 50% chance of happening, not any combination of specific top-4 players. And indeed, that's what you get when you analyze the last 6 years' draws. In the last 20 Grand Slam tournaments, there were 9 tournaments with the #1-#3 combination, and 11 tournaments with the #1-#4 combination. On the women's side, by the way, there were 11 tournaments with #1-#3 and 9 tournaments with #1-#4. Overall, those results make perfect sense for an event with a probability of 50%. In fact, this sample is too small to give it any statistical meaning, and it would be better to look father back for more exact numbers - but then, of course, you don't have Djokovic and Federer to conspire about.

The "problem" for Djokovic and Federer is that they never (not even once!) had a Grand Slam tournament where they were certain to avoid each other. Nadal has been inside the top2 for 19 out of the 20 Slams I looked at, thus ensuring that Federer and Djokovic couldn't be both #1-#2 or #3-#4 at the same time. The one Slam where Nadal was seeded 3rd (USO 2009) had Murray ranked 2nd, thus, again, ensuring that Federer and Djokovic could be drawn together. So, at the end of the day, if you're looking for someone to blame for this luck of the draw, you might as well blame Rafael Nadal.


Tournament Year1 2 3 4 Draw
W 2007 Federer Nadal Roddick Djokovic 1-3
USO 2007 Federer Nadal Djokovic Davydenko 1-4
AO2008 Federer Nadal Djokovic Davydenko 1-3
RG2008 Federer Nadal Djokovic Davydenko 1-4
W2008 Federer Nadal Djokovic Davydenko 1-3
USO 2008 Nadal Federer Djokovic Ferrer 1-4
AO2009 Nadal Federer Djokovic Murray 1-4
RG2009 Nadal Federer Murray Djokovic 1-3
W2009 Nadal Federer Murray Djokovic 1-3
USO 2009 Federer Murray Nadal Djokovic 1-4
AO2010 Federer Nadal Djokovic Del Potro 1-3
RG2010 Federer Nadal Djokovic Murray 1-4
W2010 Federer Nadal Djokovic Murray 1-3
USO 2010 Nadal Federer Djokovic Murray 1-4
AO2011 Nadal Federer Djokovic Soderling 1-4
RG2011 Nadal Djokovic Federer Murray 1-4
W2011 Nadal Djokovic Federer Murray 1-4
USO 2011 Djokovic Nadal Federer Murray 1-3
AO2012 Djokovic Nadal Federer Murray 1-4
RG 2012 Djokovic Nadal Federer Murray 1-3

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

What if?

After Novak Djokovic's first loss of the year, in the semifinals of Roland Garros, I had a fleeting thought - "What if he manages to win both Wimbledon and the US Open? This could've been a chance to complete the Grand Slam". The thought evaporated quickly enough, as the prospect of winning both slams still seemed far at the time - more a dream than a possible reality.


The thought made a comeback some time after Wimbledon. "What if he can take the US Open title? How will we look back at the French open then?"


Suddenly, it didn't look so far fetched anymore. Surely it will be hard to find someone who can challenge Novak?

As the North American swing started, it became harder to imagine him grabbing three slams in one year. Djokovic looked shaky in most of his matches in Montreal, even though he won the title. Cincinnati was even worse. With an ailing shoulder, Novak only won the semifinal due to Berdych retiring, bothered by the same injury. In the final he suffered his second loss of the year, retiring against Andy Murray. Could he recover in time for the last Grand Slam of the season?

(Click to enlarge)

Turned out that he could. And now that he has won three out of four Grand Slam tournaments, beating Rafael Nadal for the sixth straight time, I'm sure many are saying - what if?


So, what if Novak could beat Roger Federer in that French Open semifinal? What would've happened then?

Could he have won the Roland Garros? On one hand, nobody beats Rafael Nadal at the French Open (unless your name is Robin Soderling, but 2009 was definitely an exception). On the other hand, Novak had already won against him twice on clay, and as we know now - he can also beat him in best-of-five format, repeatedly. Judging by his form during the tournament, and by his mental state against Djokovic in the next match they played (Wimbledon final), I think Nadal would probably have lost this final, as well. But then... what is the chance that Novak could go on as he did? The streak would've continued, and the pressure of "When will it end?" could reach such levels to make it impossible to deal with. He'd come to Wimbledon less relaxed, and the rest of the summer might look completely different.
(Then again, what would happen to Nadal's confidence if he lost RG? Too many 'if's here.)

At the end of the day, all of it doesn't matter. History knows no 'if's. We fans became gluttons for winning (insert a no-gluten joke here). Three slams? Not enough, we want all four. Two losses? That's 2 too much. But none of us could ever dream that 2011 will look like this. If anyone promised us on January 1st that Novak would have a Slam in his pocket - we'd sign on it in blood. In fact, choose any part of Novak's 2011 season, suggest it to any player on one of the tours - I'm sure they'd take it without hesitation. What else can we say, but "Novak, we're damn lucky to be your fans. Thank you!"?


And yet, as I went to sleep yesterday, thinking about how difficult it's going to be for him to complete a career Grand Slam next year (or ever), that pesky thought crept into my mind... What if?

(Photos: Getty Images)

Thursday, 30 June 2011

Roland Garros photos - better late than never


Fran practicing



Rafa


Andy



Rafa fans

The one and only - Kader Nouni! (And a Rafa facepalm)





"Maybe next time, no?"

"Very very happy to be in final"

Nole shirt in action :)

Nole!

Roger

Roger fans (a.k.a. 99% of the stadium)





Almost the only Serbian fans in the crowd. One of them had "No. 1" on his shirt... Alas :(


Finals day, sitting on court #1 and watching on the big screen


2010, Serbia def. France in Davis Cup finals. Had to take a photo! :)

There are some more, less interesting (or slightly repetitive) photos on my facebook. Here's a link to the album.

Tuesday, 7 June 2011

Roland Garros: We're going to the Final!

The grass season started today, and it already seems as though yesterday's final is old history. But since I was at the Roland Garros yesterday, I'd like to stay on the clay for a few more moments.

So, finals day. The grounds were buzzing early on, filling up long before the start of the most important match - Rafael Nadal vs. Roger Federer. The tournament's daily newspaper said it all:


We came early, and made it just in time to see the last games of the Boys' final, and most of the first set of the Girls' final match. Who knows, maybe one day I'll get to brag that I saw Bjorn Fratangelo (USA) and Ons Jabeur (Tunis) winning their (first?) Roland Garros titles ;)
My brother and I actually liked the girls' other finalist, Monica Puig (ranked 314 in the WTA). We already saw her playing on the semifinals day, and my brother dubbed her "Ivanovic", because of the Adidas kit similar to the one Ana's usually wearing. Yesterday we discovered that she also fist-pumps a little bit like Ana :)

Since we only had a grounds-pass for Sunday, we watched the final on a big screen put on Court #1. With a big crowd, and all the ball kids in attendance (apart from those who were on court, of course), it was a great atmosphere. And you can see a small bit of Philippe Chatrier from there, so you really get the feel that you're watching what's happening next door.


The weather gave us all a bit of a scare. It was predicted to rain on Sunday, but when the match started, the sun was blazing brightly and it was scorching hot. Then, at 6-5 40:40 in the second set, the clouds that were slowly creeping in decided that enough is enough. And it happily rained for five minutes or so, just enough to disrupt play, but not enough to make us move from our perfect viewing spots. We didn't even need an umbrella, and the cool breeze was a welcome change at that point.

Rain isn't enough to stop Rafa when he's playing on Roland Garros' clay, though. A few moments before the end of the match, the sun came out again.

Rafael Nadal def. Roger Federer 7-5, 7-6, 5-7, 6-1

Saturday, 4 June 2011

Sunset in Roland Garros

Wow. How can I sum up a day like today? I'm pretty much drained emotionally right now (plus, it's 1 a.m.), so forgive me in advance if this post turns out to be not too coherent ;) All the photos you're about to see were taken with my phone, so sorry for the quality... But there are better ones coming (probably in about a week).

So, the day started with us (my family and me) getting a little bit lost on our way from the Metro to the stadium. That's because I decided to use the etrance that was described as the less crowded on the RG site, and so we were the only ones going to the stadium from that specific Metro station. We'll use the main entrance on Sunday, and then I'll be able to compare what's better.

After arriving, we checked out Suzanne Lenglen (Wilander & Pernfors against McEnroe and Gomez). The Legends were still warming up, so we left quickly, watched a few minutes of a Juniors' match on a nearby court, and continued on a walk around the grounds. Within 5 minutes, I already bought myself a RG hat (expensive, yet so comfortable).

The next thing on our list was watching practices. The guys all practiced on Philippe Chatrier, so we couldn't watch them, but we did get to watch a bit of Na Li, who was hitting with her husband on court #4, both laughing and smiling.


Then we found out that Francesca Schiavone was training on court #8, and quickly headed out there. She was absolutely adorable, and at one point gifted a tennis ball to a small child (~2 years old, I'm guessing) near the court. (Awwwwww...)
After her practice, her coach gave out a few tennis balls, as well - and since my brother was almost the only child there at that moment, he got one :) Then she signed both the ball and in my brother's tennis-autographs-notepad. So, Forza Francesca!!! ;)


Next, we got back to Suzanne Lenglen to catch some of that Legends doubles action. McEnroe was his usual angry self when missing shots, and we got lucky enough to see a racquet chucking :D
 


 After grabbing something to eat, and watching a bit of a Girls semifinals match between Irina Khromacheva from Russia and Monica Puig from Puerto Rico (those girls are damn impressive!), we met those two young ladies outside of Philippe Chatrier:


I have to say, the scene itself was kind of horrible. They stand there for long minutes, surrounded by photographers and a whole crowd of spectators, and they have to pose for the cameras in some ridiculous positions. But I guess that's the price you have to pay for being a Grand Slam finalist, and all that.

Then it was the money time. Philippe Chatrier for 7.5 straight hours. Nadal beat Murray, 6-4, 7-5, 6-4, in a very very very long match. But you know what, despite of the extreme hate he gets sometimes, Murray isn't world #4 for nothing. The guy can play some great tennis, and it was a very enjoyable match today. He broke back a couple of times - it seems that the tournament has a curse which can be summed up as "If you're serving at 5-2, you're going to get broken". But in the end, Rafa got his first birthday gift - a victory and a ticket to the finals.


(I promise to have normal photos later, where you can... like... see the players.)

During this match, the crowd was pretty calm. More Rafa support, but good level of applause on Andy's finest shots. As it should be. In the second match, on the other hand...

Well, Federer won against Djokovic, 7-6(5) 6-3 3-6 7-6(5). Talk about a close score... Obviously, this result wasn't the best part of my day, to say the least... But they had a wonderful match, so different from the first one in its speed and style, and with some incredible rallies. Those are truly two of the best players in the world, and you could see it in every shot they hit. As much as it pains me to say it, the best man on court today was the one who won. I don't know if it's the long break from play (thanks again, Fognini), or the disappointment in losing the first set, but after a shaky start to the match, Novak's level dropped considerable in the second set.
The Novak of the 43-0 streak appeared again in the third set of the match. It was like seeing a different player entirely - the backhand was doing wonders, the balls found the court in all the right places, and he wasn't broken back at all. The fourth set could have been better (well, obviously), as every break wasn't consolidated - which particularly hurt in the end, when he was serving for the set. But I think I'll hate tie-breaks from now on. When it was 6-3 in the last set, I said to my brother "You'll see, even if Nole gets those next two points, Roger's going to end it with an ace". And that's exactly what happened. So, another birthday present for Rafa, who gets to keep his #1 ranking a little longer - unless Roger beats him in the final.


The final score is pretty indicative of what we saw today, I think. It was a very close match, but Roger was better, I can't deny it. The only thing that bothered me, as you might have guessed, was the crowd. There were SO MUCH more people rooting for Roger than for Novak. I did my best with some "Ajde Nole"s, but the level of applause for the two players couldn't be more different. One had the whole crowd behind him, and the other one scarcely got anything from most of the French. There was a bunch of Serbs in the crowd, I would've wanted to sit with them, but they were too far away :P

So, the day ended on a sad note for me, but it was great nonetheless. We're going back on Sunday with a grounds-pass - so we'll see the finals on a large screen. I'll try rooting for Roger this time, but I'm afraid it won't be easy :P

Anyway, thanks for helping me plan my future trips abroad, Roland Garros!


(Photos by me. Sorry again if the post contains mistakes, too tired to spell proof at the moment. Good night Paris!)